Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7641 (UTT)

ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1478/2026 · 2026-07-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010098512026 2026:UHC:5379 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1478/2026 Arun Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Prakash Chandra, learned Counsel for the petitioner through V.C. 2. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned Brief Holder for the State-respondent nos.1,3,4 and 5. 3. Mr. Saurav Adhikari, learned Counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Mr. Rajendra Arya, learned Counsel i/b Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned Counsel for respondent no.6. 5. On the last date, learned State Counsel had stated that the period of project has been extended from July, 2026 to March, 2027 and the petitioner is working in the said project. On the said statement, learned Counsel for the petitioner sought time to seek instructions as to whether petitioner has been retained in the project or not. 6. Today, learned Counsel for petitioner states that after extension of period, petitioner is retained in the project. 7. In such view of the matter, no further relief can be granted to the petitioner at this stage. 8. Recording the statement made by learned State Counsel which is accepted by learned Counsel for petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.07.2026 R.Dang RAJEEV DANG Digitally signed by RAJEEV DANG DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=963da6fc6df8dbb91944e0c58b9ed259ec3d800f419a11 99f15a3961c8ca2957, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=63F6E663A1DD44892EED6B81F043D778B37D74 D2DB7200F2DABC7ABCC1CA358D, cn=RAJEEV DANG Date: 2026.07.06 18:39:05 +05'30'