CRP No. 4271 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 4271 of 2025 and CMP.No.21913 of 2025 Mr.C.S.Ramesh Proprietor of M/s.CS Rao Infra Projects, Flat B, Virdi Residency, 57, Thangam Colony, H Block, 30th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 040. Petitioner Vs M/s.P.K. Vaduvammal A Registered Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, Mr.D.M. Suresh, No.1 Blackers Road, Gaiety palace, Unit -4A, 4th Floor, Anna Salai, Chinthadripet, Chennai - 002. Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the docket order passed in IA No.2 of 2025 in COS No.290 of 2024 on the file of Principal Commercial Court, Egmore Chennai Docket order dated 15.07.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ram Pranav.M.N.R for M/s.S.Veeraraghavan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Maghizhnan for M/s.P.S.Deepika https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4271 of 2025 ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner in IA.No.2 of 2025 seeking to condone the delay of 90 days in filing written statement. 2. It is seen from the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of IA.No.2 of 2025, the suit summons were served on the petitioner/defendant on 31-12- 2024. He filed written statement along with the petition to condone the delay of 90 days in filing written statement on 29-04-2025. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned by the petitioner, the trial court allowed the said application on 02-07-2025 subject to the condition to the petitioner to make a payment of Rs. 2000/- to the respondent/ plaintiff on or before 14-07-2025. Since the petitioner failed to comply with the conditions within a time stipulated on the next date on 15-07-2025, IA.No.2 of 2025 was dismissed for failure of the petitioner to comply with the conditional order. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come before this court. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed application seeking extension of time for payment of the cost amount on 28.07.2025 and the same has not been considered by the trial court. The application said to have been filed by the petitioner is included in the typed set of papers at Page Nos. 43 to 47. However, the petitioner has not given SR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4271 of 2025 number of the petition filed by him seeking extension of time. 4. Since the petitioner failed to comply with the condition, the trial court dismissed the application. When the petitioner failed to comply with the condition, the trial court has no other option but to dismiss the application filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing written statement. Therefore, we cannot find fault with the order impugned in this revision. However, it is open to the petitioner to file an application seeking extension of time for complying with the condition in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Gowri Ammal Vs Murugan and Others reported in 2006 (3) CTC 418, wherein it was held that the petition for extension of time could be filed under Section 148 of CPC, even after expiry of time fixed for performance of an act by the Court. 5. 5. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to file application for extension of time. If any such application is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with the law. 6. With this direction, the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 07-01-2026 Index:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4271 of 2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No nr To The Principal Commercial Court, Egmore Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4271 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR J. nr CRP No. 4271 of 2025 and CMP.No.21913 of 2025 07-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis