Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 764 (RAJ)

URMILA W/O LATE SHRI RAKESH, v. HUKAM SINGH SON OF SHRI KISHAN SINGH,

CRES/100/2026 · 2026-03-10

Sandeep Taneja

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10240] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 100/2026 In S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3848/2017 1. Urmila W/o Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Abhijeet Son Of Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharat- pur, Rajasthan. 3. Sukhdarshan Son Of Shri Bhagmal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharat- pur, Rajasthan. 4. Shanti Devi W/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.s. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Mamta D/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vil- lage Bandha, P.s. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Hukam Singh Son Of Shri Kishan Singh, Resident Of Sa- hahpur, Tehsil And P.s. Deeg, District Bharatpur.(Owner Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241). 2. Rohan Singh Son Of Shri Hakim Singh, Resident Of Tam- rauli, P.s. Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur. (Driver Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241). 3. Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited, Through Regional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 10003E-Riico, Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur (Raj.) (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05- Ra-9241). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 10/03/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:10240] (2 of 2) [CRES-100/2026] This application is filed for restoration of the civil misc. ap- peal. The civil misc. appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by this Court and the order dated 22.08.2025 passed by the Registrar (Judicial). For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and the civil misc. appeal be restored to its original number, subject to the applicant-appellant filing the requisite extra set for service upon respondents within a period of four weeks. In case of failure to do the needful, the restoration order passed today shall stand revoked without reference to the Court. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/55