HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10532 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri G.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 25 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS and 66 I.T. Act, registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Auraiya during pendency of the trial. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the FIR has been lodged against unknown and name of the applicant has surfaced during investigation. It is further submitted that Rs.2,20,000/- is said to have been credited in the bank account of the applicant in the alleged cyber fraud and cash above Rs.1,40,000/- is also said to have been recovered from the applicant and co-accused. It is further submitted that chargesheet in the case has been submitted and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 23.11.2025. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant. 5. FIR has been lodged against holders of mobile nos. 7423682044 and 6398432275 and during investigation, name of the applicant has surfaced and Rs.2,20,000/- is said to have been credited in the bank account of the applicant in the alleged cyber fraud. Chargesheet in the case has been submitted and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 23.11.2025. 6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : G.S.Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyapal Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED. 7. Let the applicant Satyapal Singh involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. April 20, 2026 Madhurima BAIL No. 10532 of 2026 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad