1 2026:CGHC:18700 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2292 of 2025 1 - Sachin Mishra S/o Nand Kishore Mishra Aged About 31 Years R/o R-12, Moti Nagar, Near Sharda Petrol Pump, Boriakhurd, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Tanmay Mendhe S/o Shri Shankar Mendhe Aged About 30 Years R/o Sneh Kirana Bhandar, Station Road, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Shahid Ahmed S/o Anish Ahmed Aged About 35 Years R/o Near Masjid, Moudhapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Sajid Ahmed S/o Hamid Ahmed Aged About 42 Years R/o House No. 521, Parshad Gali, Near Moudhapara Masjid, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Aman Baraily S/o Kiran Baraily Aged About 30 Years R/o 24, Babla Complex, Banstal Road, Infront Of Shaheed Ismarak Bhawan, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Sohail Khan S/o Abdul Gaffar Khan Aged About 32 Years R/o House No. 503, Firoz Manjil, Moudhapara Masjid, District- Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Transport Commissioner, Chhattisgarh Office Of The Transport Commissioner Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Commissioner Finance Office Of The Transport Commissioner Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Transport Officer Mahasamund (C.G.) Office Of The District Transport Officer Mahasamund (C.G.), Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - Enforcement In-Charge Office Of The District Transport Officer Mahasamund (C.G.), Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - In-Charge Officer Transport Check Post Khamharpali, District- BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 Mahasamund, Office Transport Check Post Khamharpali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) -- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioners : Mr. Yashraj Verma, Advocate For Respondents/State. : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 23/04/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.3, which is an application for withdrawal of writ petition. 2. On due consideration of the pleadings made in the application and submission of learned counsel for petitioners, which is not opposed by learned counsel for State, I.A. No.3 is allowed and writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file suitable application for redressal of their grievance before appropriate forum. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram