Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7632 (JHR)

SAHABUDDIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6179/2025 · 2026-04-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11635 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6179 of 2025 1. Sahabuddin Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Ali Hussain Ansari 2. Rahamatulla Ansari, aged about 44 years, son of Ali Hussain Ansari 3. Ajamatulah Ansari @ Azmatullah Ansari, aged about 18 years 4. Md. Naimuddin Ansari @ Naymuddin Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Md. Jeevaili Miya 5. Umar Faruk @ Umar Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Sahabuddin Ansari All residents of village Penk, Tola-Ranikurha, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Penk Narayanpur, District-Bokaro, State-Jharkhand ….. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha (4), Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeeumuddin, A.P.P 02/ 21.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Penk Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 44/2025, registered under sections 191(2)/190/126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/74/76/303(2) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and there is dispute with regard to land and in view of that petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that there is direct allegation of outraging modesty against all these petitioners. He submits that case diary has been received and in the case diary it has come that four ladies members have received injury and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R it transpires that there is direct allegation of outraging modesty against all these petitioners. In the case ( 2026:JHHC:11635 ) diary it has come that four ladies members have received injury. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.21.04.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-