[2026:RJ-JP:20974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4308/2026 1. Pooja Meena D/o Brij Mohan Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Bhoolaheri, Post Laturi, Teh. Sangod, Dis- trict Kota, Rajasthan-325207 2. Poonama Ram S/o. Roopa Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/ o. Gomrakh Dham, Taratra Math, Teh.-Chohtan, Dist.- Barmer, Rajasthan-344012. 3. Kamlesh D/o Lala Ram Gurjar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Vill. Chirawal Mali, Post Sirthala, Teh. Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321205 4. Madhu Bala Tailor D/o Bhag Chand Tailor, Aged About 40 Years, R/o H. No. 13, Gyan Vihar B.k. Kaul Nagar, District Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001 5. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vill. Kasganj, Post Maloni Panwar, Teh. Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328023 6. Suman Kanwar D/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Vill. Kishanpura, District Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan-333036 7. Taga Ram S/o Jala Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Vill.- Shivpura, Post.- Hoteegoan, Th.- Chitalwana, Dist.-Jalore, Rajasthan-343027. 8. Man Mohan Yadav S/o. Umrav Lal Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o. Village Govari, Post. - Garh Basai, Teh.- Thanagazi, Dist.- Alwar, Rajasthan.-301022. 9. Manisha Jangid D/o. Radhey Shyam Jangid, Aged About 38 Years, R/o. Gujer Wala Balaji Ke Pass, Vp Bhandarej, Dist.-Dausa, Rajasthan. -303501. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education De- partment, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan- path, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Ra- jya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018 3. The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Lalgarh [2026:RJ-JP:20974] (2 of 3) [CW-4308/2026] Palace, Near Unnamed Road, Samta Nagar, Bikaner 334001. 4. Deepak Depawat S/o Bhawani Dan Charan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jain Jawahar Mandal Ke Pass Deshnok, Dis- trict - Bikaner, State-Rajasthan - 334801. 5. Mamta Meena D/o Prahlad Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Ismailepura, Post Bagdi, District Tonk, State Rajasthan - 304801 6. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/ o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524. 7. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/ o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524. 8. Robin Sharma S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Ghamurwali, Tehsil Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335042. 9. Rajesh Datusala S/o Sahi Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Sirsali, Tehsil Churu, District Churu, Rajasthan- 331029 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat for Mr. Nalin G. Narain for RSSB HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/05/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties jointly submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 11.05.2026 passed by this Court in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. & Ors. connected matters in S.B. CWP No. 13045/2025, wherein following directions were given: "17. Consequently, while allowing these writ petitions, it is directed that the respondents shall determine correct num- [2026:RJ-JP:20974] (3 of 3) [CW-4308/2026] ber of vacancies on the basis of guidelines given by the Di- vision Bench of this Court as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Namonarayan Sharma & Others (supra) and after assessing the correct number of vacancies, the respondents shall reexamine the claims of the petitioners afresh and, in case the petitioners are other- wise eligible in terms of the advertisement and are found to have secured higher marks, on the basis of revised results, than the last appointed candidate in their respective cate- gory, the respondents shall offer appointment to the peti- tioners, subject to availability of the vacancies, after rede- termining their existence in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the case of Namonarayan Sharma & Others (supra) within a period of two months from the date of re- ceipt of certified copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall also be entitled to notional benefits of pay fixation and se- niority qua candidates appointed earlier despite securing lesser marks, however, without any entitlement to actual monetary arrears for the past period. Simultaneously, it is directed that no candidate already appointed pursuant to the original answer key shall be terminated solely on ac- count of subsequent revision of the answer key, since they were not at fault. 18. However, the benefit of this judgment shall remain con- fined only to the petitioners before this Court and to those candidates, who had already approached this Court and whose writ petitions are pending consideration. Any fence- sitter who remained indolent and failed to agitate his rights within reasonable time shall not be entitled to claim benefit on the basis of the present judgment." 2. In view of above consensus arrived at between learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dis- pose of this writ petition in the same terms and with the same di- rections as given in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & Ors. (supra). 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 19/NEERU