Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 763 (AP)

SMT NIMMAGADDA LAKSHMI v. VARRE KUMARA SWAMY

CRP/659/2026 · 2026-04-09

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010104772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 659/2026 Between: 1. SMT NIMMAGADDA LAKSHMI, W/O. SUBRAHMANYM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-19, CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VARRE KUMARA SWAMY, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. 2. VARRE GANESH KUMAR, S/O. KUMARA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above-named Petitioner/JDR begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition being aggrieved by the order passed by the order of Honble Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First ClassVijayawada E.A.No. 28/2026 in E.P.No.289/2024 in I.A.No.1659/2022 in O.S.No.500/2022, Dt19.02.2026 grounds to be urgedat the time of hearing. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P. No.289/2024 in I.A.No. 1659/2022 in O.S.No.500/2022 including the order under E.A.No.28/2026, dt: 19.02.2026 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vijayawada pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI KUMAR C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SUBODH 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: There is no representation when the revision petition is called for hearing. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also absent. 2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 10.04.2026 ARR 4 179 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 659/2026 Date: 10.04.2026 ARR