Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 76299 (MAD)

G.SATHYA v. RAMAN

CRP/4178/2023 · 2026-02-09

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CRP No. 4178 of 2023 and CMP No.25455 of 2023 1. G.Sathya W/o. Ramu D/o. late. M.Govindasamy, Veppampatti Village and Post, Vaniyambadi Post and Taluk, Vellore Dist. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Raman S/o. Late.M.Govindasamy, D.No. 62/34, 2nd Cross, Cooperative Colony, Krishnagiri Post taluk and Dist. 2.G.Bairavan S/o. Late.M.Govindasamy, No. 62/34, 2nd Cross, Cooperative Colony, Krishnagiri Post taluk and Dist. 3.G.Indira W/o. Late.Periyasamy D/o. Late.M.Govindasamy, Door No.12A, Vediyappan Koil St, Anna Nagar (Papparapatty) Krishnagiri Post, Taluk and Dist. 4.G.Thangam W/o. Sadasivam D/o. Late.M.Govindasamy, Puliollai Kovil village, Serakkanatham Post and via, Natrampalli Tk, Vellore Dist. Respondent(s) Revision filed under Sectioin115 of Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order dated 04.09.2023 made in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.98of 2019 on the file of Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri. For Petitioners No apperance For Respondent(s): R.Poornima https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.B.BALAJI.,J sr ORDER Learned counsel for the respondents brings to my notice that possession has already been taken and recorded before the trial Court and nothing survives for consideration in this revision. 2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09.02.2026 sr Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order CRP No. 4178 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis