Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7629 (BOM)

Ajit B Satam v. Vishnu M Jadhav

ARBP/373/2026 · 2026-09-03

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

41-ARBP-373-2026.doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 373 OF 2026 Ajit B Satam … Petitioner V/s. Vishnu M Jadhav … Respondent Mr. Bhavesh Parmar with Rajesh Sahani with Mamta Shah i/b Mamta Shah, for petitioner. Adv. D. Shukla, mr. Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Mr. Vishal Tiwari CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 3, 2026 P.C.: 1. Since the Arbitrator is already appointed and the Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, the present Petition under Section 9 is converted into an application under Section 17. The merits of the contentions of both parties are kept open before the Arbitrator. 2. The application under Section 17 shall be decided as expeditiously as possible. 3. The petition is disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.09.03 17:53:11 +0530