2026:JHHC:11639 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1810 of 2026 ------ 1. Taufik Ansari @ Taufik Alam, son of Pir Mohammad Ansari 2. Amana Bibi, wife of Pir Mohammad Ansari 3. Sahena Bibi @ Sahana Khatoon, wife of Tanat Hussain All are residents At Chaura, P.O. and P.S. Pandu, District Palamau .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. ------ 02/21.04.2026 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.3 has been inadvertently arrayed in the present case as she has already been granted anticipatory bail by the impugned order. In view of that, he is withdrawing the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.3 Sahena Bibi @ Sahana Khatoon. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that this petition will now survive for petitioner nos.1 and 2. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.3 Sahena Bibi @ Sahana Khatoon is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos.1 and 2 and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner nos.1 and 2 are apprehending their arrest in connection with Untari Road P.S. Case No. 6 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner nos.1 and 2 submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the family members, and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault and pursuant to that grievous injuries have been received. He also submits that two of the accused persons’ anticipatory bail has already been rejected by this Court in A.B.A. No.1786 of 2026. 2026:JHHC:11639 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations of assault are general and omnibus in nature and the co-accused, Sahena Bibi @ Sahana Khatoon has been granted anticipatory bail being the lady by the learned Sessions Judge. Considering the allegation is identical against petitioner no.2- Amana Bibi, in that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner no.2 - Amana Bibi and as such the petitioner no.2- Amana Bibi, is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner no.2- Amana Bibi on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 6. So far petitioner no.1- Taufik Ansari @ Taufik Alam is concerned, his case is identical to those persons, whose anticipatory bail has been rejected by this court in A.B.A. No.1786 of 2026. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.1- Taufik Ansari @ Taufik Alam. However, if the petitioner no.1- Taufik Ansari @ Taufik Alam surrenders before the learned court by filing regular bail application, the same will be considered in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 23.04.2026