[2026:RJ-JP:19976] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5459/2026 Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Mukti Lal Meena, aged about 38 years, R/o Opp. PNB Marg, Devnagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Government, Department of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Managing Director, Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer-305004. 3. Secretary (Admn.), Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer-305004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 12/05/2026 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition against order dated 12.03.2026 issued by the Secretary (Admn.), AVVNL, Ajmer, whereby the petitioner, who has been working on the post of Sr. AO (IA), AVVNL, Corporate Office, Ajmer, has been directed to perform as Sr. AO (Rev.), AVVNL, Corporate Office, Ajmer. 2. On a specific query raised by this Court to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in what manner the order dated 12.03.2026 is causing prejudice to the petitioner, the answer was in negative, however, the only reason for challenging [2026:RJ-JP:19976] (2 of 2) [CW-5459/2026] the impugned order is that the petitioner is not inclined to work as Sr. AO (Rev.) 3. It is a settled proposition of law that this Court while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot interfere in day to day routine business of respondent-Corporation and it is well within the jurisdiction of Corporation to assess the suitability of a particular officer with regard to his working on a particular post. 4. The impugned order has apparently been passed on account of accrual of administrative exigencies and there appears to be no malafide in issuance of impugned order, nor is there any violation of statutory rules; hence, there is no scope for interference in the impugned order. 5. Consequently, the writ petition filed by the petitioner, is hereby, dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/16