HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33280 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.17 out of 61) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Siddharth Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.151 of 2026, under Sections 109(1) BNS and Section 3/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station Didarganj, District Azamgarh, during pendency of trial. 4. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has submitted that the criminal history assigned to the applicant has not been properly explained, as the bail orders in three cases, i.e. (i) Case Crime No.9/2022, under Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act & Section 411 I.P.C., Police Station Zafarabad, District Jaunpur, (ii) Case Crime No.12/2022, under Section 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Jalalpur, District Jaunpur and (iii) Case Crime No.114/2026, under Section 303(2) BNS, Police Station Saraimir, District Azamgarh, have not been appended to the affidavit filed with bail application. 5. Learned A.G.A. has also highlighted that as far as Case Crime No.61 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of UP Gangster Act, Police Station Maharajganj, District Jaunpur is concerned, the rejection order has been appended instead of filing the order granting bail to the applicant. As such, the applicant is not entitled to bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deeksha Gupta, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rashid .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In rebuttal, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the criminal history assigned to the applicant has been explained in para-15 of the affidavit filed with bail application. 7. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the material available on record, this Court finds that, the criminal history assigned to the applicant has not been properly explained. Accordingly, this Court is not satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail. 8. The bail application is, accordingly, rejected. 9. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court shall be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party, if there is no legal impediment. 10. It is clarified that the observations made herein are confined to the consideration of the present bail application and shall not affect the merits of the case during trial. September 18, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 33280 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad