UKHC010114532026 2026:UHC:5417 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 1690 of 2026 06 July, 2026 Jagdish Chandra Sharma --Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Transport Corporation & others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Suresh Chandra Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of certiorari, quashing the impugned pay fixation as also the recovery order, whereby certain amount has been directed to be recovered from him. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy has been set at rest by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide judgment and order dated 14.06.2022 passed in WPSS No.1593 of 2021, Balam Singh Aswal Vs. Managing Director and Others and Batch of writ petitions, which are subsequently affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 04.04.2024 in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun & Others Vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena, and Batch of Special Appeals. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has also submitted that the present matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 14.06.2022, which was UKHC010114532026 2026:UHC:5417 2 affirmed in Special Appeals, as referred above by learned counsel for the petitioners, vide judgment dated 04.04.2024. 5. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment and order dated 14.06.2022 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPSS No.1593 of 2021 Balam Singh Aswal Vs. Managing Director and Others and Batch, which was affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022 Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun & Others Vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena and Batch, vide judgment dated 04.04.2024. The case of the petitioner shall abide by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 14.06.2022, which was later on affirmed vide judgment dated 04.04.2024 in Special Appeals as stated above. 6. No order as to costs. 7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.07.2026 AK