Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 76193 (MAD)

K.Kala mani v. C.P.Adhithiya Senthil Kumar and 5 others

CONT P/3874/2025 · 2026-01-23

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 __________ 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 K.Kala mani, S/o. Late Kalyanasundaram, 135, Tiruvalluvar Nagar, Bharathi Street, Viruthachalam, Cuddalore -606 001. ..Petitioner Vs 1. C.P.Adhithiya Senthil Kumar The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. V.Latha, District Adi - Drividar Welfare OfÏcer, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 3. M.Rajasekaran, District Revenue OfÏcer, Viruthachalam, Cuddalore -606 001. 4. Tmt. M.Banumathi, The Commissioner, Town Panchayat, Viruthachalam. 5. K.Vetrivel,The Spcial Tahsildar, Special Tahsildar (A.D.W) OfÏce, Virithachalam. 6. Aravindan, The Tahsildar, Tahsildar OfÏce, Viruthachalam. ..Contemnors Prayer : Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act t punish the 4th Respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 09.04.2025 in W.P.No. 12629 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr. R.Prathaban For Contemnors : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Additional Government Pleader – for R1 to R3, R5 and R6 Mr.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel – for R4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 __________ 2 of 4 Order The order passed by this Court on 09.04.2025 was to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.07.2024 and to pass orders within a period of eight weeks. 2. When the matter was called, Mr.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent has produced the proceedings of the Commissioner, Vridhachalam Municipal Corporation dated 02.06.2025, whereunder the representation of the petitioner dated 30.07.2024 has been disposed of. The same is scanned and extracted hereunder. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 __________ 3 of 4 3. Mr.R.Prathaban, learned counsel for the petitioner urges that this order is contrary to the factual position and requires to be interfered with. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it is for him to challenge the same in a separate proceeding. The Contempt Petition is closed as the order of this Court dated 09.04.2025 has been complied with. 23-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To 1. C.P.Adhithiya Senthil Kumar and 5 othersThe District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. V.Latha,District Adi - Drividar Welfare OfÏcer, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 3. M.Rajasekaran,District Revenue OfÏcer, Viruthachalam, Cuddalore -606 001. 4. Tmt. M.Banumathi,The Commissioner, Town Panchayat, Viruthachalam. 5. K.Vetrivel,The Spcial Tahsildar, Special Tahsildar (A.D.W) OfÏce, Virithachalam. 6. Aravindan,The Tahsildar, Tahsildar OfÏce, Viruthachalam. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 __________ 4 of 4 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. KST CONT P No. 3874 of 2025 23-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis