Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 76182 (MAD)

M/S.ASTER COMPORT DESIGNS PVT LIMITED v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/35472/2024 · 2026-02-16

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 35472 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 35472 of 2024 1. M/s.Aster Comport Designs Pvt Limited Rep. By Its Director Mr. Gautam Chand Somawat, At B22, Phase Ii, Mepz Sez, Tambaram, Chennai -45. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruvallur Collector Office, Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvallur Taluk And District.Tiruvallur. 3.The Tahsildahar Tiruvallur Taluk Office, E Tiruvallur Taluk And District. 4.Mr.Karupaiah (died), 5.Puspha, 6.Boopathi, 7.K.Sethupathy, Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to cancel the patta No.7915 in Ref No.20247 / 13 -3743 /1423 dated 30/04/2014 issued in favour of the 4th respondent by the 3rd respondent in respect of S.No.798 / 2A2 for 6 cents 2.2.Ares) situated at https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35472 of 2024 Polivakkam Village, Polivakkam Tiruvallur Taluk and District and issue the patta for the correct measurement for 14 cents in S.No.798 /2A in favour of the petitioners purchased by them under the Sale Deed Dated 06/05/2013 Doc No.2050 of 2013 at SRO Manavala Nagar. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Nagu Sah For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate For R1 to R4 Mr.P.Prince Premkumar, For R5 to R7 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to cancel patta No.7915 standing in the name of the fourth respondent, who is now dead and represented by his legal heirs viz., the respondents 5 to 7. 2. The petitioner claims that the fourth respondent had illegally obtained patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in his name. According to the petitioner, the said property is owned by them. The fourth respondent died during the pendency of this writ petition. The respondents 5 to 7 have been brought on record as his legal representatives by this Court. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents would also submit, on instructions, that pursuant to the representation given by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35472 of 2024 second respondent on the said representation, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent. In view of the same, no prejudice will be caused to any of the parties if the representation of the petitioner, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent is considered on merits and in accordance with law by the second respondent after hearing the objections of the petitioner as well as the contentions of the respondents 5 and 7 and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions of the petitioner as well as the respondents 5 to 7. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents 5 to 7 has also not raised any serious objection if a direction is issued to the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the contentions of the petitioner as well as the respondents 5 to 7 and also after giving due consideration to the documents produced by them within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35472 of 2024 fourth respondent for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the petitioner as well as the respondents 5 to 7 and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire and the supporting documents filed by them. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 16-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35472 of 2024 To 1.The District Collector Tiruvallur Collector Office, Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvallur Taluk And District.Tiruvallur. 3.The Tahsildahar Tiruvallur Taluk Office, E Tiruvallur Taluk And District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35472 of 2024 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 35472 of 2024 16-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis