Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097812026 2026:GAU-AS:8004 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1071/2026 ATABUR RAHMAN ALIAS ROHMAN S/O ABDUL MALEK VILL NO. 2 KHAGORIJAN PS LUMDING DIST HOJAI ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HALDAR, MS S. BASAK Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, -BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 08.06.2026 Heard Mr. B. Haldar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned APP for the state respondents. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNS 2023, praying Page No.# 2/3 for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Lumding P.S. Case No.25/2026 under Section 108 of BNS 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 24.02.2026 by the informant, alleging that his daughter aged about 16 years was mentally tortured by the accused/applicant for the last 2 years with proposals of love; due to such harassment, his daughter had to absent herself from taking examination one year ago that the accused/applicant went outside the state for some time, then again he came back and started harassing his daughter again; Due to such harassment, the minor daughter of the informant had committed suicide by hanging herself. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant submits that in fact the informant's daughter and the accused/ applicant was in a love relationship and he has not done anything which could have led to the commission of suicide by the victim girl. He submits that there is no incidence of any abetment from his side and therefore, the accused/applicant should be granted pre-arrest bail at this stage. 5. The case diary in the instant case has been produced before this Court and the same is perused. 6. On perusal of the case diary, this Court is of the considered opinion that there are prima facie sufficient incriminating materials against the accused/applicant of his involvement in the offence so narrated in the FIR. 7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory application stands rejected. Page No.# 3/3 8. The instant anticipatory application stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant