Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7616 (RAJ)

DILKHUSH S/O HARKESH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6844/2026 · 2026-05-04

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:18851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6844/2026 Dilkhush S/o Harkesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dobda Khurd, Police Station Surwal District Sawai Madhopur (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 04/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 09/2026 registered at Police Station Sawaimadhopur, District GRP Ajmer for the offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 112(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act and Section 13 of RPGO. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not committed any cyber fraud and allegation that petitioner is involved in the act of gambling is false. It is further contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and charge-sheet has already been [2026:RJ-JP:18851] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6844/2026] submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dilkhush S/o Harkesh, in connection with FIR No. 09/2026 registered at Police Station Sawaimadhopur, District GRP Ajmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /76