Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7616 (HP)

PREM CHAND v. THE HPTDCL AND OTHERS

EX.P./14/2026 · 2026-01-07

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 14 of 2026 Date of Decision: 7.1.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Prem Chand ……...Petitioner Versus HPTDC and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 13.5.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.4453 of 2025, titled as Prem Chand v. HPTDC and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondents/competent authority consider and decide representation of the petitioner in light of judgment rendered by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4427 of 2023, titled Tulsi Ram v. HPTDCL and Ors., within a period of four weeks. Since no action, whatsoever, came 2 to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of three weeks from today. 3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by Learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. January 7, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge