Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7613 (RAJ)

ABHISHEK JAIN S/O SATISH JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6628/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19122] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6628/2026 Abhishek Jain S/o Satish Jain, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kalibai Road, Grandil Mohalla, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Non-petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramu Dubey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 13/2026 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station(Dholpur), District Dholpur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2026. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner and nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:19122] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6628/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Abhishek Jain S/o Satish Jain is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/41