p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2577 of 2026 Sushena Das …. Petitioner Mr. B. Dalai, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 22.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 1700 of 2025 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Jagatsinghpur, arising out of Jagatsinghpur P.S. Case No.793 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Section 109(1)/115(2)/127(2)/324(2)/333/356(2)/3(5) of BNS. 3. Taking into account the nature of allegation, as borne out from the statement of the complainant, it is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case at hand and omnibus allegations have been made. Hence, the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail. p. 2 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. 5. This Court perused the statement of the complainant as well as the injury report wherein, the injuries have been categories as simple. 6. Considering the same, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent. 7. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 10. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi