2026:HHC:6781 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 1213 of 2025 Reserved on: 26.2.2026 Date of Decision: 12.3.2026. Akshay Thakur ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors. …. Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner : Mr Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent No.1-State : Mr Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. For Respondents No.2 to 4 : Mr Munish Kumar, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 222 of 2024, dated 17.11.2024, registered at Police Station Sadar, Solan, District Solan, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and consequential proceedings arising out of the said FIR based on the compromise effected between the parties. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:6781 2. It has been asserted that the parties have entered into a compromise after the registration of the FIR with the intervention of the respectable members of the society. They want to maintain cordial relations, and the informant and the victim do not want to proceed further with the matter after the compromise. They have no objection in case the FIR is ordered to be quashed based on the compromise effected between the parties. Hence the petition. 3. Statements of the informant, Jai Singh, victim Konika Thakur, and driver Praveen Kumar of another vehicle were recorded on 17.12.2025, in which they stated that they had entered into a compromise with the accused voluntarily without any influence from any person, and they had no objection in case the FIR is ordered to be quashed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the records carefully. 5. The offence punishable under Section 281 of BNS corresponds to Section 279, and Section 125(a) of BNS corresponds to Section 337 of IPC. This Court has already quashed the F.I.R. registered for the commission of offences 3 2026:HHC:6781 punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of IPC in Sushant vs State of H.P. 2023 HLJ 531, Vikas Huda vs. State of H.P. 2023 STPL 3009, Kulwidner Singh vs Ankush Kumar 2023 HLR 384 and Nishant vs. State 2022 Suppl. Shim Law Cases 45 based on compromise. These judgments are binding on this Court. 6. In view of these binding precedents, the present petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 222 of 2024, dated 17.11.2024, registered at Police Station Sadar, Solan, District Solan, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(a) of BNS is ordered to be quashed. Consequent upon the quashing of FIR, criminal proceedings pending/initiated against the petitioner-accused in pursuance thereto are also ordered to be quashed. 7. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. 8. Parties are permitted to produce a copy of this judgment, downloaded from the webpage of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist on the production of a certified copy, 4 2026:HHC:6781 but if required, may verify passing of the order from the Website of the High Court. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 12th March, 2026 (Chander)