Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7610 (ALL)

RAMUGRE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22479/2026 · 2026-09-16

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22479 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought for quashment of the F.I.R. is accordingly declined. Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners recasts his relief and prays that the petitioners may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking other appropriate remedies available with him under the law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation that it is always open to the petitioners to avail such other remedies as may be advised. September 17, 2026 Karan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Patel, Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Ramugre And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad