HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5535 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Court does not find that prayers made in this writ petition are supported by any specific documents as well as copy of representation annexed along with this writ petition are also not very specific, still ignoring such defects, in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach concern respondent with all necessary averments and documents for the purpose to consider the prayer for arrears of salary and in such event, concern respondent will look into the matter. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. April 20, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Paritosh Sukla, Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shruti Malviya (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Mahendra Pratap Singh Dohare .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad