Continental Agencia v. M/s.SAS Leather Private Limited
CMP/29629/2025 · 2026-02-16
C V Karthikeyan, K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 76093 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 76093 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 29629 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CMP No. 29629 of 2025 in Appeal (CAD) No.61 of 2025
1. Continental Agencia, Mohammed Ehtesham, Proprietor, having office at Marble House, 118/7, Vepery High Road, Periamet, Chennai 3.
2. M/s.Star Asia Leather Company, Rep by Mohammed Ehtesham, having office at Flat No.E, 11, SL, Windsor Mansion, 29-31, Chatam Road, Tsinhatsui Kowloon, Hong Kong.
3. Mohammed Entesham ..Appellant(s) Vs M/s.SAS Leather Private Limited, Rep by its Managing Director Faisal Nezam, having its office at No.104/A, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Phase II, Puliyanthangal, Ranipet 632 403. Vellore District, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 29629 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 To stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Judgment and decree dated 17.07.2025 and made in C.O.S.No.97 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Commercial Court at Egmore, Chennai, pending disposal of the above first appeal. For Appellant(s): Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahamed for Ms.Kowser Sulthana I. For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Venkatakrishnan ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) The learned counsel for the respondent contended that the appeal had been filed against a money decree granted on the basis of the goods sold and delivered and amount not paid. It is stated that to set aside an ex-parte decree, an application had been filed and a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- had been directed to be deposited. That amount had accrued interest. The respondents are permitted to take steps to withdraw the sum of Rs.15,00,000/- together with accrued interest and also the costs component. 2.It is also stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that properties are under attachment and that the value of the properties far exceeds the decree amount. 3.The petition for stay stands closed by making the stay absolute till the disposal of the appeal, however, granting permission to the respondent as aforestated to withdraw the amount mentioned therein. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 29629 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4.Appeal may be listed in due course.
(C.V.K.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 16-02-2026 sli To The Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 29629 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J. sli CMP No. 29629 of 2025 in Appeal (CAD) No.61 of 2025 16-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis