Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7607 (AP)

Penumatscha Srinivasa Raju, v. Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.,

CC/1393/2026 · 2026-08-06

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010152302026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1393 OF 2026 Between: 1. Penumatscha Srinivasa Raju,, S/o. Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, Aged about 52 years, R/o. D.No. 2-76, Dharma Rao Peta (V), Koyyalagudem (M) Eluru, West Godavari District ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri G Sai Prasad I A S, Principle Secretary to Government Irrigation and CAD Water Resources Department, Secretariat Buildings, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. Smt C Nagarani I A, The District Collector, (Irrigation wing) Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. 4. Sri Ch Devaprakash, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru District. 5. Sri U Ramesh Babu, The Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Water, Resources Department, Godavari Western Division Nidadavole, East Godavari District. ...Respondents 2 VS,J C.C.No.1393 of 2026 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 19922 /2025 dated 26.11.2025 by Learned Single Judge Counsel for the Petitioner: ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following 3 VS,J C.C.No.1393 of 2026 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.19922 of 2025, dated 26.11.2025. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “…..this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificate dated 01.11.2025 issued by the respondents within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order….” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/contemnors furnished a copy of Letter No.No.FIN01- FMU0MISC/350/2022(1778130), dated 07.08.2026, issued by the 2nd respondent, wherein it is stated that an amount of Rs.27,38,460/- was paid to the to the petitioner vide Bill No.2026-71169804, dated 06.08.2026, with Ref.No./XUTR/RBISH00783868676. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above instructions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.08.2026 KGR