Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097662026 2026:GAU-AS:7996 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1321/2026 BOLORAM RAY S/O LATE DULAL RAY R/O KACHAKHANA, HARINCHARA, PAGLAGANJ, P.S. TAMARHAT, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HOSSAIN, S KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 08-06-2026 Heard Mr. M. Hossain, the learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant. Also heard B. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Sessions Case No. 345/2025 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhubri. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant submits that the applicant is in jail for more than 8 (eight) months and the trial is at the evidence stage. Vis-à-vis the vital witnesses in the instant case who are family members of the victim and the accused person itself, have already been examined. There is no any threat of influencing the witnesses in the instant case and therefore, he submits that taking into account his long detention in the instant case, the accused/applicant should be granted bail in this case. 4. Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and has stated that some vital witnesses involved in the instant case are yet to be examined and there is every possible chance that the witnesses may be influenced by the accused in the event of his release on bail in this case. 5. The Trial Court Record of this instant case has been produced before this Court and the same has been perused. It is seen from the Trial Court Record that one of the vital witnesses deposed under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023, implicating the accused/applicant, is yet to be examined. It is also seen that the way the offence has been committed by the accused/applicant and taking into account the heinous nature of the offence as well as the fact that some vital witnesses are yet to be examined, this Court does not find any reason to grant Page No.# 3/3 bail to the accused/applicant at this stage. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant Bail Application stands rejected at this stage. 7. Send back the Trial Court Record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant