HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 669/2026 CM No. 1520/2026 Mohammed Sadeeq …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Pranav Lakhnotra, Advocate Vs Bharat Petroleum corp Ltd & Ors .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jugal Kishore Gupta and Ms Ishna Vaid, Advocate for R-1&2 Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-3 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (01.04.2026) 01. The record reveals that for the last two consecutive dates of hearing none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and today also a request for adjournment has been made by Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate, which is declined. 02. Since it is a fresh matter and the petitioner is not inclined to argue the matter, thus an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the same. As such, the instant petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 01.04.2026 Vijay S. No. 116 Vijay Kumar 2026.02.12 20:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document