[2026:RJ-JP:19118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5524/2026 1. Rajveer S/o Raghuveer Nath, Age About 33 Years, R/o Kanhora Police Station Rodai District Rewadi Haryana. (At Present Confined In Jail Khetri District Jhunjhunu). 2. Deewan Alias Sunil S/o Rajunath, Age About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Dinod Police Station Sadar Bhiwani Haryana. (At Present Confined In Jail Khetri District Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 315/2025 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) punishable under Section 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner are in custody since 10.03.2026. He further submits that the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the [2026:RJ-JP:19118] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5524/2026] bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 10.03.2026; that the present offence is triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Rajveer S/o Raghuveer Nath & Deewan Alias Sunil S/o Rajunath are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:19118] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5524/2026] 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/27