Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7595 (KAR)

SRI RAMESH H v. M/S UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND

MFA/3524/2020 · 2026-02-09

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7539 MFA No. 3524 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3524 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RAMESH H S/O SHRI HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS EMPLOYEE NO.6498 WORKING AS SECURITY GUARD M/S BOSCH LTD (FORMERLY CALLED AS MICO) NAGANATHAPURA PLANT ELECTRONIC CITY POST BANGALORE-560010 R/AT NO.129, SIDDESHWARA KRUPA PARAPANAPA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560100 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CLIFTON D ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD., NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER (HUMAN RIGHT AND ADMINISTRATION) M/S UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD., Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7539 MFA No. 3524 of 2020 NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANOJ KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANTH B.K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Smt.Maitreyi Krishnan, counsel on behalf of Sri.Clifton D.Rozario, for the appellant and Sri.Manoj Kumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.Prashanth B.K., for caveator / respondent appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the respective parties jointly submit that as the suit has been disposed of on 10.06.2025, nothing survives for consideration. Hence, the appeal may be disposed of as having become infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7539 MFA No. 3524 of 2020 3. Taking note of the submission that the suit is already disposed of, nothing survives for consideration in the present appeal. 4. Resultantly, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47