2026:JHHC:12557 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.106 of 2025 ---- 1. Taiyab Hussain @ Md. Taiyab, aged about 43 years, S/o Chhatu Miyan 2. Mobin Ansari @ Md. Mobin, aged about 47 years, S/o Abdul Majid 3. Md. Imran Ansari, aged about 24 years, S/o Md. Muslim Ansari @ Muslim Miyan 4. Md. Gulzar Ansari, aged about 34 years, S/o Mohammad Muslim @ Muslim Miyan, All the resident of Village-Harhad, P.O Hazaribag, P.S. Muffasil, District Hazaribag …. …. Appellant(s) -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Karu Ram, S/o Late Harlal Ram, resident of Village-Banhaa, P.O. Katkamdag, P.S. Katkamdag, District Hazaribagh …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Appellants : None For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. P.P. For the O.P No.2 : Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, Adv. ---- 11/Dated: 29th April, 2026 1. The order dated 18th April, 2026 reads as under:- “1. Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant. 2. Earlier the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been dismissed vide order dated 20.06.2022 in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 256 of 2022 holding that the offence under the SC/ST Act is made out and as such, section 18 of the SC/ST Act bars the grant of anticipatory bail. 3. However, with a view to give an opportunity to the appellants, put up this case in the next week.” 2. On repeated calls, even today, nobody has appeared on behalf of the appellants. 3. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is hereby, dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 29th April, 2026 Raja/- Shahid Uploaded on 30.04.2026