[2026:RJ-JP:20217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6927/2026 Sabir S/o Hareta, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ghoghor Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rajpal Yogi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.28/2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both parties reside in the same locality and, due to a trivial dispute relating to water supply, the aforesaid FIR has been lodged on false and concocted allegations. He submits that the specific allegation against the present petitioner is of causing a life-threatening injury to the injured, Osama. However, the medical opinion with regard to the said injury indicates that the same was not sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of [2026:RJ-JP:20217] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6927/2026] nature, and none of the injuries sustained by the injured have been described as life-threatening. Co-accused Nasim and Mohammed Kaif have already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 15.04.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.04.2026. Though one criminal antecedent has been reported against the present petitioner, in the said case also he has already been granted bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sabir S/o Hareta, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/78