Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7585 (AP)

Tota @ Tirumalasetti Saroja v. State of A.P.

CRLRC/1361/2015 · 2026-08-13

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010095402015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1361 OF 2015 Between: 1. Tota @ Tirumalasetti Saroja, W/o Swamy Rushikesh @ Sankar, age about 24 years, Occ:House wife, R/o D.No.34-1-3/3, N.J.Plaza, Doddipatlavari Street, Tanuku. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of A P, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. 2. Tirumalasetti Swamy Rushi Kesava Sankar, S/o Udaya Bhaskara Rao, age 37 years, Occ: Business, R/o Near Andhra Bank, Akiveedu. ...Respondents Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order dated 20-04-2015 passed in Crl.Revision Petition No.51 of 2013, on the file of IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2148 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 20-04- 2015 passed in Crl.Revision Petition No.51 of 2013, on the file of IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku" pending disposal of Crl.R.C., and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1361 OF 2015 ORDER: Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner herein, who is the wife of respondent No.2, has obtained a divorce from him and has subsequently remarried. In view of the same, learned counsel prayed that the revision be dismissed as infructuous. 2. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. 3. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J Date: 14.08.2026. PAB THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1361 OF 2015 DATE: 14.08.2026 PAB