Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17271 WP No. 27539 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 27539 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SRI.SYED MUJAHID S/O SRI. SYED HASHAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.49, MOORE ROAD FRAZER TOWN BENGALURU - 560005 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED MUJAHID, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST) ZONE, BRUHATH BANGALOREE MAHANAGARA PALIKE MAYOHALL, BENGALURU - 560005.
2.
ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER (MARUTHI SEVA NAGAR) SUB DIVISION, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU - 560033.
3.
M/S INDIA FINANCIAL ASSOCIATION OF SDA RESIDINGA T NO.12, HAI STREET, COOK TOWN BENGALURU - 560005 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.S.KARTHIKEYAN.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17271 WP No. 27539 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN THE PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO. JC(E)/KMC/SEC 114A/45/18-19, DATED 19/12/2023 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
On 22.01.2026, the following Order was passed:
"1. Memo of retirement dated 29.10.2025 has been filed by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to retire from the case on the ground that the petitioner has collected the entire file along with the NOC vakalathnama.
2. Today, a memo has been filed producing the acknowledgment of the petitioner.
3. Accepting the memo of retirement and memo of acknowledgment filed today, Sri A. Chandra Chud is discharged from the matter. Registry is directed to delete his name as such and print the name of the petitioner with the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17271 WP No. 27539 of 2025
endorsement earlier counsel retired in the cause-list.
4. Re-list on 03.02.2026. None appears for the petitioner. If none were to appear for the petitioner on the next day of hearing, petition would be liable to be dismissed for non- prosecution."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Even on the last date of occasion, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
3. For the said reason, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37