919-WP.11780.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 WRIT PETITION NO. 11780 OF 2026 Renuka Samadhan Batle VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary And Others ... Mr. Sahil Choudhari h/f. Mr. D. D. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Sachin V. Kuptekar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, learned AGP submits that, by today evening, the Committee would pass its judgment and issue the order to the petitioner. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner, however, insists that this Court should issue directions to the respondents to grant admission to the petitioner atleast provisionally, in case the claim is invalidated. He relies upon by the order passed by the Division Bench at Nagpur in the case of Aditi Ramsing Jadhao vs. The Vice- Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Yavatmal & Anrother1. 1 Writ Petition No.6545 of 2026 dated 24.08.2026 Sayyed 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:41070-DB 919-WP.11780.2026.doc 3. Learned advocate for respondent no.3, however, points out the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Dilip Vitthal Bambale & Others vs. Vinitkumar Motiram Totlod & Others2. 4. Considering above, this Court finds it difficult to accede to the prayer of the petitioner to direct the authorities to grant provisional admission to the petitioner. 5. Petition stands disposed off. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) 2 Civil Appeal Nos.11234-48 OF 2017 Sayyed 2/2