Dudekula Shamsad Begum v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6770/2026 · 2026-08-05
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7576 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7576 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI Main Case No:Crl.P.No.6770 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No.
Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01.
06.08.2026 MRK,J IA No.1 of 2026
Heard
learned counsel for the petitioners.
Dispensed with for the present. Crl.P.No.6770 of 2026
1. Heard
learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and sought time for obtaining instructions in the lis.
3. Issue notice to unofficial respondent No.2.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the unofficial respondent No.2 through speed post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
2
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1(A2) is married sister of A1 and petitioner No.2 (A3) is husband of petitioner No.1(A2) and the allegations against the petitioners (A2 and A3) are generic in nature.
6. In view of facts and circumstances, coupled with the authoritative dictum held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Geddam Jhansi Vs. State of Telangana1, the presence of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 (A2 and A3) in C.C.No.436 of 2025 before Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Markapur, is hereby dispensed with for a period of ten (10) weeks.
7. List this matter on 08.10.2026. ______ MRK,J KRK
1 2025 SCC Online SC 263