[2026:RJ-JP:18724] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5870/2026 Rajendra Singh @ Raju Bangali S/o Late Bheem Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. D-77, Near Ankita School, Indra Colony, Vigyan Nagar, Police Station Vigyan Nagar, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swaraj Panwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/05/2026 1. The present 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rajendra Singh @ Raju Bangali S/o Late Bheem Singh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.331/2024 dated 16.07.2024 registered at P.S. Kekri Shahar, District - Ajmer, for the offence under Sections 331(3), 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. [2026:RJ-JP:18724] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5870/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19th September 2024 and still trial is at slow pace. He also submits that the details of cases is not rightly available with him but there is huge delay in trial, so the petitioner is entitled for bail on ground of period of incarceration and also of delay in trial. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. The first bail application of the present petitioner was dismissed on 23.09.2025. The present petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2024. The material on record indicate that 30 criminal cases are registered against the petitioner and out of which the petitioner was convicted in three cases, though he has been acquitted in two cases but remaining cases are pending. The pace of trial is slow and same cannot be appreciated, but considering the criminal antecedents, I am of the considered view that this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner accused on bail. 7. The facts and the material indicate that role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:18724] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5870/2026] 8. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 9. Accordingly, the 2nd application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by the applicant-accused Rajendra Singh @ Raju Bangali S/o Late Bheem Singh is hereby dismissed. 10. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude within a period of six months from date of receipt of copy of the order. 11. The Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court by E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/51