[2026:RJ-JP:19071] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6269/2026 Ravikant @ Ravi @ Rahul S/o Lalchand, R/o Anand City, Near Mega Highway, Bandikui, P.S. Bandikui, District Dausa (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kolana Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6326/2026 Santosh Kumar @ Rakesh S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad, R/o House No. 1445, Ward No. 17, Handloom Wali Gali, Trambe Station P.S. Clock Tower, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kolana Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6339/2026 Vishal Panwar @ Ashok S/o Jagdish Panwar, R/o House No. 893, Ward No. 17 Harijan Basti, Trombe Station Thana Clock Tower District Ajmer. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Isaq Abbasi, Adv. Mr. Kritin Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order [2026:RJ-JP:19071] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6269/2026] 06/05/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.543/2024, registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa, for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioner-Ravikant has already been enlarged on bail in another case pertaining to FIR No.546/2024, registered at Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa for offence of similar nature. It is further contended that the petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and contended that the accused-petitioners are habitual offender and against them two criminal cases of similar nature are pending, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and taking note of the fact that matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, accused petitioners are in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the [2026:RJ-JP:19071] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6269/2026] merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Ravikant @ Ravi @ Rahul S/o Lalchand, 2. Santosh Kumar @ Rakesh S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad and 3. Vishal Panwar @ Ashok S/o Jagdish Panwar, in connection with FIR No.543/2024, registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for there appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the addresses and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the aforementioned accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. 8. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit their present addresses along with their mobile numbers to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from their release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said addresses and the mobile numbers. In case if the accused-petitioners changes their addresses or mobile numbers they shall submit the same before [2026:RJ-JP:19071] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6269/2026] the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-43-45