Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7565 (JHR)

RAFIQUE ANSARI @ MD RAFIQUE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6993/2025 · 2026-04-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:12516 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 6993 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6993 of 2025 1. Rafique Ansari @ Md. Rafique @ Md. Rafaque, aged about 50 years, son of Md. Kayum Ansari @ Kayum Ansari 2. Riyazul Ansari, aged about 40 years, son of Kayum Ansari 3. Siraj Ansari @ Md. Siraj Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of Kayum Ansari @ Md. Abdul Kaiyum 4. Atikur Ansari @ Atikur Rahman, aged about 45 years, son of Akbar Miya @ Akbar Hussain 5. Jabir Ansari @ Jabir, aged about 40 years, son of Faruk Miya @ Md. Faruk 6. Md. Alauddin @ Alauddin Ansari @ Allauddin, aged about 44 years, son of Mahbub Miya All resident of Village- Mamaahari, P.O. & P.S. Dhanwar, District- Giridih … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, A.P.P. For the Informant : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate ----- 05/29.04.2026 The matter relates to Dhanwar P.S. Case No.185 of 2025, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 2. After some arguments, Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move before the learned Court by way of filing regular bail petition, so far as petitioner nos. 2 to 6 are concerned. He submits that so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, his prayer for anticipatory bail has already been rejected as not pressed vide order dated 09.12.2025. 3. Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and Md. Razaullah Ansari, learned counsel for the informant have got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty so far as petitioner nos. 2 to 6 are concerned. ( 2026:JHHC:12516 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 6993 of 2025 5. It is made clear that if petitioner nos.2 to 6 move before the learned Court by way of filing regular bail petition, that will be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 29th April, 2026 Ajay/