Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 75644 (MAD)

B.Joghee v. The District Collector

WP/28411/2022 · 2026-02-20

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:857 WP No. 28411 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 28411 of 2022 B.Joghee ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector O/o The District Collector, Udhagamandalam The Nilgris 2. The Tahsildar O/o The Tahsildar Kotgiri, The Nilgris 3. The Superintendent of Police O/o The superintendent of Police, Udhgamandalam The Nilgris 4. The Inspector Kotagiri 5. Nanjudan ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 28.06.2022 and remove the encroachment made by the 5th respondent in survey No. 272/25 and 272/26, Odhanatty village, Kotagiri Taluk, Nilgiris by implementing the order of the 2nd respondent dated 25.08.2018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28411 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Kishore for Mr.R.Sivakumar For Respondent(s): Mr..T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present writ petition has been instituted to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 28.06.2022 and remove the encroachment made by the 5th respondent in survey No. 272/25 and 272/26, Odhanatty village, Kotagiri Taluk, Nilgiris by implementing the order of the 2nd respondent dated 25.08.2018. 2. When the matter was taken up, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions from the Tahsildar would submit that there is no encroachment in the subject land. 3. In view of the above submission, nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28411 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The District Collector O/o The District Collector, udhagamandalam The Nilgris 2. The Tahsildar O/o The Tahsildar Kotgiri, The Nilgris 3. The superintendent of Police O/o The superintendent of Police, Udhgamandalam The Nilgris 4. The Inspector Kotagiri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28411 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. GD WP No. 28411 of 2022 20-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis