Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7560 (AP)

APSRTC, REP.BY MD, MUSHEERABAD HYD. v. M. GAJENDRAN

MACMA/1867/2008 · 2026-08-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010532712008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1867/2008 & CROSS OBJECTIONS NO.46537 OF 2008 Between in M.A.C.M.A.No.1867 of 2008: APSRTC, REP.BY MD, MUSHEERABAD HYD., REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, RTC X ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. ...APPELLANT AND M GAJENDRAN, S/O M.LAKSHMAIAH NAIDU PROP. M.G.N.AUTO WORK SHOP R/O D.NO.23-40 TUIRUPATHI ROAD, PUTTUR TOWN AND MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT Between in Cross Objections No.46537 of 2008: M GAJENDRAN, S/O M.LAKSHMAIAH NAIDU PROP. M.G.N.AUTO WORK SHOP R/O D.NO.23-40 TUIRUPATHI ROAD, PUTTUR TOWN AND MANDAL. ...APPELLANT AND APSRTC, REP.BY MD, MUSHEERABAD HYD., REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, RTC X ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court set aside the judgment and decree made in MVOP.No. 204 of 2004 on the file of the MACT cum III Addl. Dist. Judge, Tiruapthi dated 17-8-07 by allowing the instant appeal 2 Counsel for the Appellant/APSRTC: W V S RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent/Claimant: P GOVIND REDDY The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: 1. The appeal in M.A.C.M.A.No.1867 of 2008 is preferred by the APSRTC on the point of quantum of compensation, which was awarded for an amount of Rs.2,14,000/- against the claim of Rs.6,00,000/-. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the appellant/APSRTC seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present appeal. 3. Notice was served on the respondent/claimant, who represented by the counsel on record. But, none appeared for the respondent. 4. Having regard to the above, permission is accorded to withdraw the appeal preferred by the APSRTC. Since, the claimant did not evince any interest to prosecute the matter, the Cross Objection filed by him is liable for dismissal. 5. Thereby, the M.A.C.M.A.No.1867 of 2008 is dismissed as withdrawn. 3 6. The Cross Objection No.46537 of 2008 is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.08.2026 Krs 4 87 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA M.A.C.M.A.No.1867 of 2008 & Cross Objection No.46537 of 2008 ( JUDGMNET ) DATE: 17.08.2026 Krs