Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7557 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD RAHIM S/O MOHAMMAD RAFIQ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/183/2025 · 2026-05-13

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:20281-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 183/2025 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.269/2024 Mohammad Rahim S/o Mohammad Rafiq, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No 32 Muglan Mohalla Jhunjhunu Presently Resided At Ansari Colony, Jhunjhunu Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Public Prosecutor Kekri District Ajmer ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate assisted by Mr. Mahesh Gurjar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Deputy Government Advocate. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 13/05/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Accused-applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. [2026:RJ-JP:20281-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-183/2025] 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant- accused has taken NOC from him. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate assisted by counsel for the complainant opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. This suspension of sentence application is pending since 04.01.2025 and according to the order-sheets, adjournment was sought on each and every date to argue the matter, and today also, when the matter was taken up, counsel for the applicant- accused submits that the applicant-accused has taken NOC from them. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the statement of PW5—eye witness, the applicant-accused has caused knife injury on the person of the deceased as well as considering the FSL Report—Ex.P27 which has also been found positive, no case is made out to allow this application for suspension of sentence. 7. In that view of the matter, this application for suspension of sentence stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/13