APHC010208772019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 9122/2019 Between: 1. KORRAPOLU SAMBASIVA REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, OCC PENSIONER, R/O PLOT NO. 197, H.NO. 3-6-40/7, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, VUNDAVALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE DIRECTOR, ESD ( MEESEVA), D.NO. 6-178, ECO RITZ BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, SER CENTRE, BMPS ROAD, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 VS,J W.P.No.9122 of 2019 7. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT MEESEVA CENTRE, NAAZ CENTRE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in not receiving and processing the application of petitioner for correcting Adangal and 1-B in respect of land admeasuring Ac.0-88 cents in survey No. 265 of Vundavalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents to receive and process the application of petitioner for correction of Adangal and 1-B in respect of land in survey No. 265 of Vundavalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to receive and process the application of petitioner for correction of Adangal and 1-B in respect of land in survey No. 265 of Vundavalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.9122 of 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in not receiving and processing the application of petitioner for correcting Adangal and 1-B in respect of land admeasuring Ac.0-88 cents in survey No. 265 of Vundavalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents to receive and process the application of petitioner for correction of Adangal and 1-B in respect of land in survey No. 265 of Vundavalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District…” 2. The petitioner herein claims to be the owner of the land admeasuring Acs.0.88 cents in Sy.No.265 of Undavalli village, Tadepalli mandal, Guntur district having inherited the same from his father by name Korrapolu Peda Venkata Reddy. The Government has also issued pattadar pass books and title deeds in favour of the petitioner pertaining to the subject land. 3. While the matter stood thus, the petitioner noticed in the online adangal and 1-B register that the extent of the subject land was inadvertently mentioned as Acs.0.63 cents instead of Acs.0.88 cents. As such, the petitioner got surveyed the subject land by following due 4 VS,J W.P.No.9122 of 2019 process of law and filed an application in Meeseva for correction of Adangal and 1-B register; at that juncture, the petitioner was informed that the 4th respondent has to endorse the said application. The grievance of the petitioner is that when the petitioner has approached the 4th respondent to endorse the application in order to submit the same before Meeseva, the 4th respondent refused to endorse the same. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. 4. Though the matter pertains to the year 2019, no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. 5. Heard Sri. Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 6. Perused the entire material available on record. Today, when the writ petition came up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader furnished a copy of the 4th respondent – Tahsildar, Tadepalli mandal, dated 11.08.2026 enclosed with his proceedings bearing Rc.No.96/2026-A, dated 13.05.2026 as per which it can be seen that the request of the petitioner was considered and the revenue records were corrected and updated in accordance with law. 7. In view of the fact that the request of the petitioner was considered by the 4th respondent and the concerned revenue records were updated, no further orders are required in the present writ petition. 5 VS,J W.P.No.9122 of 2019 8. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 11.08.2026 Gss