Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 75564 (MAD)

K.Karthik Rajan v. Chitra and another

CONT P/2142/2023 · 2026-02-12

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:610 CONT P No. 2142 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CONT.P.No.2142 of 2023 K.Karthik Rajan ..Petitioner Vs 1. Chitra The Commissioner, Annagramam Panchayat Union, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. 2. Vijayakumari The President, Panapakkam Village Panchayat, Annagramam Panchayat Union, Panruit Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: To punish the Respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No.18412 of 2023 dated 18.07.2023. For Petitioner: Mr.S.NEDUNCHEZHIYAN, For Contemnors: MR.R.RAMANLAL, AAG ASSISTED BY MR.HABEEB RAHMAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE FOR R1. Mr.M.Devaraj for R2. ***** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2142 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 4 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Contempt Petition has been filed for punishing the respondents for having not obeyed the orders of this Court dated 18.07.2023 made in W.P.No.18412 of 2023. 2. On 18.07.2023, this Court passed the following order: “4. In the light of that, the impugned notice under Section 6 is set aside. It is made clear that the respondents are at liberty to proceed ahead in accordance with law. The present order would not be an impediment for the respondent authorities to proceed in accordance with law.” 3. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the subject land has been classified as Natham. The land has been utilized for construction of Panchayat Union Office for public purposes. Therefore, Administration has taken a decision not to initiate any further action. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2142 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Finding that there is no wilful disobedience of the order of this Court, warranting further action under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, the present Contempt Petition is closed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 12-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AR To: 1. Chitra The Commissioner, Annagramam Panchayat Union, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. 2. Vijayakumari The President, Panapakkam Village Panchayat, Annagramam Panchayat Union, Panruit Taluk, Cuddalore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2142 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN,J. AR CONT.P.No.2142 of 2023 12-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis