Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7550 (AP)

Palanivel Kishore v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6505/2026 · 2026-08-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010398472026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6505/2026 Between: PALANIVEL KISHORE, S/O. PALANIVEL, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,R/O. MELAPANAGUDI, MARREMAGUDI STREET,MADHURAI, TAMIL NADU STATE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.6505 of 2026 Dated 07.08.2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to modify the bail condition imposed against the petitioner/Accused vide order dated 01.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.338 of 2026 in Cr.No.27 of 2026 of Tirupati Railway Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, vide order dated 01.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.338 of 2026 in Cr.No.27 of 2026 of Tirupati Railway Police Station, while enlarging the Petitioner/Accused on bail, imposed condition that the petitioner shall produce the local sureties. Insisting to produce the local sureties is against the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Moti Ram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh1 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another2. 4. Hence, the condition imposed by the Trial Court at Para No.8 of the order, dated 01.07.2026, requiring the petitioner to produce local sureties is 1 (1978) 4 SCC 47 2 (2022) 10 SCC 51 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.6505 of 2026 Dated 07.08.2026 liable to be interfered with and set aside. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner/Accused to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways, Nellore. Further, the condition requiring the petitioner to file title deeds for the property is also hereby relaxed. 5. The residual conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 07.08.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.6505 of 2026 Dated 07.08.2026 54 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6505 of 2026 Date: 07.08.2026 RSI