Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7547 (GAU)

SRI ROSHAN RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026 · 2026-06-07

Nelson Sailo, Rajesh Mazumdar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010111202026 2026:GAU-AS:7939-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026 SRI ROSHAN RAY SON OF LATE BOLORAM RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MALIVITA BAZAR UNDER AMGURI POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF CHIRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 08.06.2026 (NELSON SAILO, J) Heard Mr. U. Choudhury, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks for condonation of 115 days delay in filing the connected criminal appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 09.12.2025 passed by the Court of the Page No.# 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge, Bijini, Chirang in Sessions Case No. 54 of 2023. Referring to the application, the learned counsel submits that it is due to bona-fide reasons that the delay has occasioned and therefore, the delay may be condoned. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, fairly submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned and that the appeal be heard on merits. In view of above, upon considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the application, we condone the delay of 115 days in filing the connected appeal. The interlocutory application stands disposed of as allowed. Registry shall now register the main appeal and post the same for admission after a week. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant