HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33288 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Shyam Sunder Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State-respondent. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 305 of 2026, under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Karwi, District Chitrakoot, during pendency of the trial in the court below. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that however applicant is named in the FIR but from the FIR and statement of the informant who was eye witness and was alongwith the deceased co-accused Rinku Nishad was the prime accused who by causing injury committed the murder of his father i.e. deceased. 4. He further submitted that applicant is having no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 1.6.2026. 5. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the arguments on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 7. However, applicant is named in the FIR but from the FIR and statement of the informant who was the eye witness and was alongwith the deceased co-accused Rinku Nishad was the prime accused who by causing injury committed the murder of his father. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar, Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kamlesh Nishad @ Guru .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 8. Further, applicant is having no previous criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 1.6.2026. 9. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant-Kamlesh Nishad @ Guru, be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 12. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 13. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 18, 2026 Ankita BAIL No. 33288 of 2026 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad