MOHAR SINGH @ MOR SINGH SON OF SHRI GORU @ GARU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6581/2026 · 2026-05-11
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:19764] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6581/2026 Mohar Singh @ Mor Singh Son Of Shri Goru @ Garu, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Chhaprel, Police Station Paroli, District Bhilwara (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 11/05/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.58/2026 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for offences under Sections 3 ,5, 8, 9 and 10 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Rules, 1995 and Section 11(1)(a), 11(1)(b), 11(1)(d) and 11(1)(f) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Co-accused Mohammad Javed @ Aabid @ Kali and Aasif already have been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court itself on 06.04.2026 and 10.04.2026 respectively.
[2026:RJ-JP:19764] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6581/2026] Petitioner is behind the bars since 16.04.2026. Though two criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner however in both cases he has already been enlarged on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mohar Singh @ Mor Singh Son Of Shri Goru @ Garu, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J RACHNA /58