Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7544 (MAD)

K.UMAPATHY v. The State Represented by its

CRL MP/1622/2026 · 2026-03-17

A D Jagadish Chandira

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.1622 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.M.P.No.1622 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.110 of 2026 K.Umapathy ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, W-21, All Women Police Station, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. (Crime No.10 of 2019) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Sahith Ali for Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C./ 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to suspend the sentence imposed in Spl.S.C.No.35 of 2021 dated 08.10.2024, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chengalpattu and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.1622 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. ham O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 17.03.2026 ham To 1. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chengalpattu. 2. The Inspector of Police, W-21, All Women Police Station, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Crl.M.P.No.1622 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.110 of 2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis