Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7542 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR KATIYAR AND 3 OTHERS v. THE VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MOTI JHEEL, AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/35785/2026 · 2026-09-15

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35785 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Kanpur Development Authority. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that an online mutation application application has been filed by them before the Kanpur Development Authority on 28.6.2022 which was generated as Computer I.D. No.124130 for mutating their names but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Sri Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Kanpur Development Authority submits that the mutation application of the petitioners, if not already decided, shall be decided as expeditiously as possible. 4. In such circumstances, without going into the merit of the claim of the petitioners, we direct the Kanpur Development Authority to decide the mutation application of the petitioners dated 28.6.2022 strictly in accordance with law, if not already decided. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 16, 2026 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jainendra Kumar Mishra, Priyanshu Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Kumar Tripathi (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Anil Kumar Katiyar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) The Vice Chairman, Kanpur Development Authority, Moti Jheel, And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad